Post a Reply
Back to the Forum
Yeah, because if they didn't remove some stuff it would have been about 5 hours long! It was already well over two hours long in the end anyway - 152 minutes to be precise 
Posted: 13:56 Jun 04 2002
Harry Potter :)
C'mon...someone had to post something eventually !
I ot the VHS yesterday and sat down and watched it with the family...wish we'd got a DVD player though
Although the VHS gave you 'extra footage' it turned out to be just 2 scenes Who got their copy over the weekend then ?
I want the DVD !!!
I ot the VHS yesterday and sat down and watched it with the family...wish we'd got a DVD player though
Although the VHS gave you 'extra footage' it turned out to be just 2 scenes Who got their copy over the weekend then ?I want the DVD !!!
27 Replies and 7297 Views in Total. [ 1 2 ]
Posted: 13:56 Jun 04 2002
IU was reading the paper a imnute ago and they had a couple of pics from the new film...Dobby looks soooo cute !
Roll on November!!
Roll on November!!
Posted: 16:44 Jun 04 2002 
which begs the question should it have been made into a film at all?!
by Stoo
Yeah, because if they didn't remove some stuff it would have been about 5 hours long! It was already well over two hours long in the end anyway - 152 minutes to be precise
Posted: 20:11 Jun 04 2002 
It also begs the question, what are they going to do with The Goblet of Fire? That book is at least twice as long as the others, so how are they going to cram it all in? I heard somewhere that they were going to make it into two films, but I don't really believe that, it just wouldn't work imo.
Posted: 22:35 Jun 04 2002
i love the books, but never got around to seeing the film....
now i'm not so sure i want to, in case my imaginary pictures are completely thrown away and it doesn't live up to the book
dya think its advisable?
i was ultra happy when LOTR was everything i imagined and a whole lot more heh
now i'm not so sure i want to, in case my imaginary pictures are completely thrown away
and it doesn't live up to the bookdya think its advisable?
i was ultra happy when LOTR was everything i imagined and a whole lot more heh
Posted: 20:04 Jun 13 2002 I would say yes. For me, the film recreated all the imagery of the book in superb detail. Most of it turned out exactly the way I had pictured it when I read the books. It was great!
by Spitefulangel
i love the books, but never got around to seeing the film....
now i'm not so sure i want to, in case my imaginary pictures are completely thrown away
dya think its advisable?
The only thing that stands out that didn't match my original thoughts was the sorting hat. In my mind it shouldn't have talked out loud it should have just communicated with the person wearing it. But maybe that's just me.
Posted: 14:43 Jun 15 2002 
No, i thought it was only talking to the individual too, particularly in Harry's case.
by PictureOfFlowers
The only thing that stands out that didn't match my original thoughts was the sorting hat. In my mind it shouldn't have talked out loud it should have just communicated with the person wearing it. But maybe that's just me.
Posted: 13:46 Jun 17 2002 The only problem would be how they could portray that on film. I think they did ok considering, lets face it only the hat wearers could hear him when he was whispering
by Watcher girl
(quotes)
No, i thought it was only talking to the individual too, particularly in Harry's case.
Posted: 13:49 Jun 17 2002 [ 1 2 ]